<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEWS: Montgomery walks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/</link>
	<description>News, Entertainment &#38; Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mixed Media &#187; NEWS: Montgomery misses court</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixed Media &#187; NEWS: Montgomery misses court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>[...] councilor failed to show for a court hearing on the matter. In August, special prosecutor Don Colee dropped a public intoxication charge against Montgomery with the understanding that Montgomery would seek some sort of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] councilor failed to show for a court hearing on the matter. In August, special prosecutor Don Colee dropped a public intoxication charge against Montgomery with the understanding that Montgomery would seek some sort of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Anyone represented by Mr. Montgomery should by now realize where his priorities lie... and that would be among other places face down in a parking lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone represented by Mr. Montgomery should by now realize where his priorities lie&#8230; and that would be among other places face down in a parking lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Joel and O.J.: both innocent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel and O.J.: both innocent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Whitmire</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Whitmire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Montgomery&#039;s lawyer had accused the city of not giving him the proper medical attention he needed. As you can see, he messed his face up pretty bad, and he claimed he had hurt his vertebrae in the fall, too. According to the police report, Montgomery refused medical help at Cooper Green, but perhaps they could have done more.

What&#039;s more, Montgomery never took a Breathalyzer, so there would have been the additional problem of proving he was drunk.

From the looks of things, Montgomery&#039;s legal team threatened to make things expensive for the city if the prosecutor pushed the case, so in the end the prosecutor surrendered faster than the French Army.

The dismissal gives Montgomery a clean rap sheet, but the political cost is still high. It will be interesting to see what kind of blow-back might come from a city councilor threatening to sue the city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montgomery&#8217;s lawyer had accused the city of not giving him the proper medical attention he needed. As you can see, he messed his face up pretty bad, and he claimed he had hurt his vertebrae in the fall, too. According to the police report, Montgomery refused medical help at Cooper Green, but perhaps they could have done more.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, Montgomery never took a Breathalyzer, so there would have been the additional problem of proving he was drunk.</p>
<p>From the looks of things, Montgomery&#8217;s legal team threatened to make things expensive for the city if the prosecutor pushed the case, so in the end the prosecutor surrendered faster than the French Army.</p>
<p>The dismissal gives Montgomery a clean rap sheet, but the political cost is still high. It will be interesting to see what kind of blow-back might come from a city councilor threatening to sue the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always a bad idea to let public officials off easy. It gives the perception of corruption, even if it isn&#039;t real corruption. And honestly, there&#039;s little difference between perception and real corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always a bad idea to let public officials off easy. It gives the perception of corruption, even if it isn&#8217;t real corruption. And honestly, there&#8217;s little difference between perception and real corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivi</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>on what grounds could he sue the city anyway? I don&#039;t get it. How did he buy off the prosecutor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on what grounds could he sue the city anyway? I don&#8217;t get it. How did he buy off the prosecutor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Joe, I agree.

Kyle, congrats on getting the story first, once again.  The Birmingham News flash mentions nothing about an agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I agree.</p>
<p>Kyle, congrats on getting the story first, once again.  The Birmingham News flash mentions nothing about an agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Birmingham Blues &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Charges Against Montgomery Dismissed</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Birmingham Blues &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Charges Against Montgomery Dismissed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>[...] to drop the charges in exchange for Montgomery&#8217;s agreement not to sue the city.  As usual, Kyle Whitmire at Mixed Media has the story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to drop the charges in exchange for Montgomery&#8217;s agreement not to sue the city.  As usual, Kyle Whitmire at Mixed Media has the story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamweekly.com/blog/2007/08/17/news-montgomery-walks/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>I think the parking lot should sue Mr. Montgomery. He clearly assaulted it with his face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the parking lot should sue Mr. Montgomery. He clearly assaulted it with his face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>