Print This Print This

Posted on November 3rd, 2008 in Featured, News, News & Views, Politics

Battlegrounds, Part IX: Iowa – Can Iowa deliver again for Obama?

By Matt Hooper

\
\
This is the ninth\’a0 and last in a series of closer looks at Barack Obama\’92s path to victory through the nine so-called \’93battleground\’94 states on Nov. 4. \
\
Before we begin, here\’92s the set-up. I project Obama with 231 solid electoral votes: California (55), Washington (11), Oregon (7), Minnesota (10), Wisconsin (10), Michigan (17), Illinois (21), Maine (4), New Hampshire (4), Vermont (3), New York (31), Massachusetts (12), Rhode Island (4), Connecticut (7), New Jersey (15), Delaware (3), Maryland (10), Hawaii (4) and Washington, D.C. (3). That leaves nine battleground states, each in varying degree of lean or toss-up: Pennsylvania (21), Ohio (20), Virginia (13), Florida (27), North Carolina (15), New Mexico (5), Nevada (5), Colorado (9) and Iowa (7). Obama must secure 39 of those electoral votes to reach the 270 needed to win the presidency.\
\
Each of these battleground states will be judged in the light of their 2004 turnout and results. You\’92ll remember that George W. Bush defeated John Kerry, 286-251, in 2004, precisely because he won eight of these nine states.\
\
Today\’92s state: Iowa, with 7 electoral votes.\
\
2004 Results:\
\
Bush won 50-49, a difference of 10,059 votes. Turnout: Roughly 65 percent.\
\
\
\
What to watch for/Bottom line: \
\
Iowa is to Barack Obama what New Hampshire is to John McCain: his political place-of-birth. His win in the caucuses earlier in January not only showed the rest of the country that he could beat the Hillary Clinton machine head-to-head, but it convinced black voters that he could win in mostly white parts of the country. That propelled him to a huge victory in South Carolina weeks later. Aside from Des Moines (Polk County), Obama doesn\’92t need to consolidate his votes in any one area, but throughout the state. In the caucus, Obama did well throughout the state, not just in the large cities. Another repeat effort in an actual vote, and he\’92ll have the Hawkeye state in his column. \
\
NOTE: Many believe that Iowa isn\’92t a toss-up state, but a solid Obama stronghold. We are inclined to believe that as well. However, since John McCain\’92s campaign has hosted multiple events there over the past few weeks \’96 including a \’93Meet the Press\’94 sit-down last Sunday \’96 they must have internal polling to indicate otherwise. In that case, we\’92ll keep them in the toss-up category just in case. \

Click the thumbnail below for a pictorial map of Obama’s path to victory in Iowa.

\

  • Share/Bookmark
blog comments powered by Disqus

WEEKLY PICKS: do more now

Weekly Tweets

War on Dumb

Birmingham 101: What will history say about us?

Birmingham 101: What will history say about us?

‘The city of perpetual promise.’ Does that mean incessant failure? Or rather, that Birmingham never gives up hope?

Upon Further Review

Bama wins, 2010 and amen

Bama wins, 2010 and amen

Part two of the college football season recap.

Column

Ties that bind

Ties that bind

A four-in-hand is worth two in the bush

Film

Casualties of war

Casualties of war

“The reasons we go to war always matter,” says the soldier played by Matt Damon [...]

Small World Cartoons

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

In lieu of politics, I bring you talking roaches. Cartoonists are primary NPD sufferers.

(Click cartoon [...]

Suburban Legends

The King of Rock: No, Not Elvis

The King of Rock: No, Not Elvis

The world is designed to piss me off