Comments on: JeffCo votes for SWMA withdrawal http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/05/12/jeffco-votes-for-swma-withdrawal/ News, Entertainment & Points of View Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:54:09 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: sireasoning http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/05/12/jeffco-votes-for-swma-withdrawal/comment-page-1/#comment-1284 sireasoning Wed, 13 May 2009 07:46:40 +0000 http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=4595#comment-1284 Fools. <br>They are going to pay 1.5 million a year instead of $400,000 just so you can replace a very effective organization with one that can be bribed and controlled. What makes matters worse is that poor oversight of our storm water (which filters into our rivers and our drinking water) will end up costing us even greater amounts of money fixing the problems of lax oversight. <br><br>So the tax payer is now paying close to 4x more money for a system that will likely lead to an increase of health problems and pollution issues where the unfortunate taxpayer will be on their own to cover those health related expenses and most likely having to pay even more tax dollars to clean up the mess.<br><br>Bad deal. Fools.
They are going to pay 1.5 million a year instead of $400,000 just so you can replace a very effective organization with one that can be bribed and controlled. What makes matters worse is that poor oversight of our storm water (which filters into our rivers and our drinking water) will end up costing us even greater amounts of money fixing the problems of lax oversight.

So the tax payer is now paying close to 4x more money for a system that will likely lead to an increase of health problems and pollution issues where the unfortunate taxpayer will be on their own to cover those health related expenses and most likely having to pay even more tax dollars to clean up the mess.

Bad deal.

]]>