<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Birmingham council demands forensic audit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/07/16/birmingham-council-demands-forensic-audit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/07/16/birmingham-council-demands-forensic-audit/</link>
	<description>News, Entertainment &#38; Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:59:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Birmingham admits budget deficit&#160;&#124;&#160;Birmingham Weekly</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/07/16/birmingham-council-demands-forensic-audit/comment-page-1/#comment-3541</link>
		<dc:creator>Birmingham admits budget deficit&#160;&#124;&#160;Birmingham Weekly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=6992#comment-3541</guid>
		<description>[...] There was nothing terribly complicated about what they did. It was a simple matter of money in minus money out — the equivalent of balancing the city’s checkbook. Unfortunately the checkbook didn’t balance. The records showed the city had spent $26 million more in 2009 than it had taken in. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There was nothing terribly complicated about what they did. It was a simple matter of money in minus money out — the equivalent of balancing the city’s checkbook. Unfortunately the checkbook didn’t balance. The records showed the city had spent $26 million more in 2009 than it had taken in. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SBurks</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/07/16/birmingham-council-demands-forensic-audit/comment-page-1/#comment-2919</link>
		<dc:creator>SBurks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 01:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=6992#comment-2919</guid>
		<description>This is great! I cant wait to see what they learn from the audit! Do the Co. Commission while you&#039;re at it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great! I cant wait to see what they learn from the audit! Do the Co. Commission while you&#39;re at it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/07/16/birmingham-council-demands-forensic-audit/comment-page-1/#comment-2914</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=6992#comment-2914</guid>
		<description>Great know LaLa is going to have a top secret press conference where he presents a &quot;real&quot; unicorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great know LaLa is going to have a top secret press conference where he presents a &#8220;real&#8221; unicorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filemanagement</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/07/16/birmingham-council-demands-forensic-audit/comment-page-1/#comment-2913</link>
		<dc:creator>filemanagement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=6992#comment-2913</guid>
		<description>You see it took 4 women who know managing money and one man who knows economic development to make this decision. Knowledgeable people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You see it took 4 women who know managing money and one man who knows economic development to make this decision. Knowledgeable people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>