<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Birmingham 2010 budget violates city&#8217;s policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/09/04/birmingham-2010-budget-violates-citys-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/09/04/birmingham-2010-budget-violates-citys-policy/</link>
	<description>News, Entertainment &#38; Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:54:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Birmingham admits budget deficit&#160;&#124;&#160;Birmingham Weekly</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/09/04/birmingham-2010-budget-violates-citys-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3542</link>
		<dc:creator>Birmingham admits budget deficit&#160;&#124;&#160;Birmingham Weekly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=8138#comment-3542</guid>
		<description>[...] But those funds never materialized. To the contrary, the city’s books reflected more expenditures, not revenues. When the council’s budget officer ran the numbers again in August, the report showed the 2009 deficit had grown from $26 million to $29 million. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But those funds never materialized. To the contrary, the city’s books reflected more expenditures, not revenues. When the council’s budget officer ran the numbers again in August, the report showed the 2009 deficit had grown from $26 million to $29 million. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Nichols</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/09/04/birmingham-2010-budget-violates-citys-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3363</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 11:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=8138#comment-3363</guid>
		<description>And it doesn&#039;t help that the Council recently voted to rebate sales taxes and occupational taxes [usually collected from the Birmingham Zoo], up to $180,000 a year for the next ten years, back to the zoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it doesn&#39;t help that the Council recently voted to rebate sales taxes and occupational taxes [usually collected from the Birmingham Zoo], up to $180,000 a year for the next ten years, back to the zoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>