Print This Print This

Posted on September 4th, 2009 in Cover Story, News & Views

So What WOULD Jesus Do about health care reform?

By Courtney Haden

You think Barack Obama’s a radical socialist? He’s practically Calvin Coolidge if you compare his ideas on providing health care to those of Jesus Christ. Two thousand years later, the mandate that we the people are obliged to take care of the poor and sick still provokes screaming denunciations, quite often from Jesus’s own followers.

Church leaders have been conspicuously inaudible during the current debate, but we are delighted to raise at least a couple such voices here. In Huntsville last weekend, we had the chance to bring together two influential Christians from differing sides of the theological spectrum to address the vexing issue of health care reform.

Bishop William Willimon.

Bishop William Willimon.

Rev. William Willimon is a top kick among clergy. As Bishop of the North Alabama Conference of the United Methodist Church, he is the spiritual leader of more than 150,000 church members and almost 800 pastors. Now in his 60s, the prolific Willimon is closing in on having written one book for every year of his life — he has two new titles coming out this fall — and recently offered his take on health care reform in one of his weekly “editorials,” within which he praised the American Medical Association and tweaked Glenn Beck.

Shane Claiborne

Shane Claiborne

Shane Claiborne might join in the Beck tweaking if he were the TV watching sort, but his lifestyle likely doesn’t include cable. Claiborne, a former Methodist, co-founded a radical faith community in North Philadelphia called The Simple Way (also known as the Potter Street Community), an outgrowth of a variegated ministerial career that’s taken him from serving in a mega-church to an apprenticeship with Mother Teresa. In his 30s, Claiborne has found time between contemplation and seeking social justice to write a few books himself, including the provocatively entitled Jesus for President.
Sitting in a small room together, one looked ready for a round of golf and the other for a round of Red Stripes, but in their colloquy, Willimon and Claiborne often found themselves on surprisingly common ground at the intersection of the sacred and the secular:

BIRMINGHAM WEEKLY: Was Jesus interested in public policy issues?

WILLIAM WILLIMON: I have no Biblical evidence to suggest He would be. I just remember how He was crucified and by whom, but that may not mean that I shouldn’t have interest in public policy. I guess one thing that interests me is, as I love those instances I observe in Alabama where health care becomes a kind of congregational church issue — we’ve got churches that are trying to pick up the pieces after people have fallen badly through the health care hole, so I’m kind of interested in that public policy. Then again, I don’t have a brain that’s good on thinking through policy, and I must say, maybe as a preacher, I ought to say to people of my congregation, “There are some of you out there that are called by God to worry about this kind of thing and have got minds that can think about it — well, Jesus expects you to do that.” Shane, is that a cop-out?

SHANE CLAIBORNE: No, I think that Jesus was interested in this world becoming what God’s dream and intention for it was and is, and that means everything that’s out of synch moving closer in synch with the things that are — Jesus says, blessed are the poor, blessed are the merciful. That, to me, is something that affects every aspect of society. Even the prophets are calling pagan kings and everyone, I think, to orient toward those things that are at the heart of God. When I look at Jesus, one of His most powerful images of the final judgment is, everyone’s brought before God, all the nations of the world, it says, and the question that we’re asked is not actually a doctrinal test — ‘Virgin birth: agree or disagree? Creation or evolution?’— but, ‘When I was sick, did you care for me? When I was in prison, did you visit me?’ I think that that call to care for the sick is a call that every one of us has to answer, whether we’re president or a next-door neighbor. My thought on the health care thing is that all of us can move closer to everyone having the adequate care that they need without saying, “You’ve got to do it exactly this way.” I think of the education system as a good example of that. Some folks are disenchanted with it and they set up home schooling. Other folks create charter schools that do it well. Other folks are working for reform within the existing public education system. I think it’s the same way with health care. Folks are going to do different things to try to move closer to the 47 million [citizens currently uninsured] getting adequate health care. As one guy in Philly said, there’s not a silver bullet, but there’s a silver buckshot, like, all of us have got to be doing something. What we can agree on is that adequate health care or adequate education, they shouldn’t be privileges of the few that can afford it, but available to everyone.

WW: One thing that bothers me about the current debate is that it just frames some of this as a federal government problem… and one other thing — and I wouldn’t say this in my editorial — I’m troubled that health care — health — has become our only salvation left. When I go into churches, and the pastor says, ‘Now we’re ready to pray. In Jesus’ name, are there any prayer requests?’ I never hear any, one single, prayer request for anything except the physical deterioration of older people. My young adult son says, “Show me where in scripture Jesus appears to give a rip about the fact that you’re old and have urological problems.” I’m struck by how few people Jesus appears to have healed, even though he healed a number of people. I love that thing there in [the Gospel of] John where Mary and Martha come and say, “Help! Lazarus is sick! Drop everything! Get over here!” Then John says, “He stayed there three more days.” And I think, Jesus, what in the heck could you have that’s more important than getting over there and getting him over that illness? Then I realize — I’m in a world where nothing important ever happens to me except illness, where the only time people ever see their pastor is when they’re sick… so I’m just saying I’m ambivalent — which is a Methodist theological virtue. I think it was Hauerwas [Dr. Stanley M. Hauerwas, distinguished professor of Christian ethics at Duke University] who said, ‘There’s nothing wrong with the practice of medicine in North America today, except we need a better class of patients who don’t believe that health care is going to bring them immortality. One of the reasons we can’t have vaccinations is we’re paying for 70 year-olds to have kidneys.’ I thought the Obama administration made a fledgling move toward that and boy, we popped him. We said, ‘Wait a minute, people over 70 vote, and we’ve got the resources, so don’t you ask us to make any accommodation for anybody. We want a health care system that will provide us the maximum possible delusion that we may be God and will live forever.’

BW: Are Christians obligated to take part in the political solution to a moral problem?

WW: I think yes. However, one thing Christians sometimes discover is, they’ve got some weird ideas about moral problems. So when you get into the discussion — like my little tiny point in my editorial was that I’m really troubled that most Americans now say, “I’m happy with my health care.” Well, as Christians, that’s a stupid statement. How is my neighbor’s health care? Jesus has made that my problem. And one other thing: I think we live in a climate which thinks, if there’s any good worth doing, there’s nowhere to get it done, except through the government, because the government is the source of all of our security and well-being and future. Well, Christians say, no, that’s wrong. One reason Christians ought to be in these discussions is I think we’ve got some really creative solutions to them. Some of our churches are participating in an initiative in Alabama about venereal diseases among ethnic minority people, particularly African-Americans. In one sense, you think, ‘Whoa, we’re uncomfortable talking about that kind of thing, we’re Christians.’ But the health department has said if you’re going to impact African-American health care in Alabama, start with the church. The church is the only place where that stuff gets on the table, so we ought to be in this discussion. But just to warn the world, you’re going to eventually run into Shane Claiborne, who’s going to say such odd things about it.

SC: Yeah, I do think we have a duty and a responsibility to be involved in the conversations and even in the changes, but I think we’re to be very particular in how we’re involved with it, and the fact that we don’t put our ultimate faith or trust in a politician or vote. I think that happened before in the issue around Sept. 11 and Iraq as someone, as a Christian, stood up with messianic language of “I’ve got a call to answer” and “I’m put in place for such a time as this.” There’s some of that same language being used now. I mean, we’ve got posters in our neighborhood of Obama with the word “Hope” under it. I think for Christians that raises some red flags. I think that we hope differently. We don’t expect change just to happen every four years in a voting booth, but we see voting as something we’re doing every day of our life, like we’re putting ourselves toward this, I think, very political message of Jesus — casting the mighty from their thrones and raising the lowly, sending the hungry away filled with good things and the rich away empty. And it’s very different from even, I think, what can win an election. It’s not even “Blessed are the middle class,” it’s “Blessed are the poor.”

03-cover-webBW: The debate over health care has raised awareness of class disparity in America among people who may not have thought about such things before. One is struck by the level of hostility at the town hall meetings brought in by people, who are nominally Christians, having to face economic disparity in their own neighborhoods. Are the teachings of Jesus supposed to help people who have not had to deal with class issues like these before?

WW: Maybe I ought to be ashamed as a pastor that it takes a debate on health care to reveal that we accommodate ourselves to these vast economic disparities. But, yes, we’ve made health care a commodity, we sell it to the highest bidder, et cetera. I guess we hear from Jesus a good deal more than we do from the average pulpit about economic disparities, pointing to those wonderful moments when Jesus says, “Do you see this woman?” and the response is, no, we have a vast mechanism to ensure we never will see her. Church maybe ought to be that place where we worry about things the world thinks are not problems and we are made to stare at stuff that we have means of avoiding. I had a woman that got upset about health care, she wrote in a few comments, and I said, “You know, this is awfully interesting, your observations, but I know your zip code, and what you have to say on this issue is suspect. You’re in Mountain Brook and I’m afraid you’re going to have to let the rest of the world debate this.” And she was a doctor’s wife, too! I did want to say, though, that if my doctor were married to someone with these opinions, I would sure want to change doctors if I could. Sadly, the biggest trouble I got into was criticizing Glenn Beck. Why did I even get into that? It isn’t worth it!

Photo by Bradford Daly.

Photo by Bradford Daly.

SC: Mother Teresa said so powerfully that it’s very fashionable to talk about the poor, but not as fashionable to talk to the poor. I love that line and I think in a lot of ways it can be very stimulating and provocative to talk about the health care crisis, and speculate on all these answers. Meanwhile, there’s people that are suffering really, really deeply, so hopefully it causes us to build those relationships.

WW: I had e-mail from a woman, and she said, “As a pharmacist, you won’t believe what I see. I see people who sit there and say, Maybe if we go without tonight’s supper, I can buy this medicine for my child, and I say, Your child has got to have this medicine”… I thought, This is so moving, what a good pharmacist you are. Then at the bottom, she said, “The sad thing is, I should have met these people at church. I shouldn’t have had to meet them at my job.” And I thought, that is beautiful. Help me to be the kind of pastor that can produce that kind of church, where it becomes something you hear at church and not something you’ve got to get dressed and go hear down at Wal-Mart.

Courtney Haden is a Birmingham Weekly columnist. Write to courtney@bhamweekly.com.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • bilutza
    Claiborne's books and views have come under criticism from some Evangelical Christians for his theology (which some have likened to the Social Gospel), his disdain of laissez-faire capitalism, a perceived support of socialism, and his radical political views.marire sani
  • freedom2009
    Jesus was not a socialist. He in fact never wanted government to do anything, he defied the senate, the king, and the Roman emporer and many others. He did not want government to rule the minds of man. He in fact wanted people to openly and freely give thier own money and time to serve thier community. That is with out government Interference. He said do good to others and his father (GOD) will provide, um.....thats not government. Jesus would never approve of government's owning people, that would violate every thing he teaches.
    He also said that people should earn thier own way through life "with the sweat of thier brow".
    Jesus was a Capitalist he was always talking about be friutful and multiply. Socialism just steal and destroys wealth.
    Try again my friend, stop trying to tell people your lies about Christianity. Obama is not Jesus and he his a socialist. Remember Hitler claimed to be a Christian. Yep. PEOPLE PLEASE READ AND LEARN HISTORY FOR YOURSELF, AND STOP BELIEVING LIES.
  • RyanMcAroni
    WOW!!! freedon2009:"Jesus was a Capitalist he was always talking about be friutful and multiply."

    you have completely put a box around Christ in Matthew 19 he states to the rich young man: "All these I have kept," the young man said. "What do I still lack?" Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."

    Please explain how this is capitalistic and not socialistic!?!
  • murasaki1
    I don't understand some people here. I see the same tired arguments of government extortion, etc. The bottom line is that people are sick, and you're not making the best choice you could to heal them. Lacking the training or will to get up off your easy chair, saying your own work and your own problems are too hard to let you do anything about it personally, you won't let your elected officials do something about it in your name either. Jesus didn't have much good to say about rich men, moneychangers, etc., and those same men (health insurers) are ignoring His will by denying the sick what they say they're providing. Worried about zero budget? Well, here's a veteran saying maybe we could do without a few half billion dollar bombers instead.
  • Nednetterville
    In Jesus' famous parable, The Good Samaritan paid for the care of the stranger he found beaten and left to die by the side of the road with his own money. He most assuredly did not resort to OPM (sounds like opium, is equally addicting, stand for other people's money) to pay the innkeeper. Jesus healed on his own dime, not money forcibly collected from others. Health care paid with OPM is stealing, because there is no difference between extortion collected by the mob and taxes collected by the state, except that the mob's collection goons risk jail for their crime whereas tax collectors are given immunity from prosecution by their government employer. It is a safe bet that Jesus would endorse his Father's unequivocal command, Thou shall not steal! http://www.jesus-on-taxes.com
  • Nednetterville
    In Jesus' famous parable, The Good Samaritan paid for the care of the stranger he found beaten and left to die by the side of the road with his own money. He most assuredly did not resort to OPM (sounds like opium, is equally addicting, stand for other people's money) to pay the innkeeper. Jesus healed on his own dime, not money forcibly collected from others. Health care paid with OPM is stealing, because there is no difference between extortion collected by the mob and taxes collected by the state, except that the mob's collection goons risk jail for their crime whereas tax collectors are given immunity from prosecution by their government employer. It is a safe bet that Jesus would endorse his Father's unequivocal command, Thou shall not steal! http://www.jesus-on-taxes.com
  • great article please read and share
  • bluesharp
    "However, on religious issues there can be little or no compromise. There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious beliefs. There is no more powerful ally one can claim in a debate than Jesus Christ, or God, or Allah, or whatever one calls this supreme being. But like any powerful weapon, the use of God's name on one's behalf should be used sparingly. The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent. If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain, they threaten you with a loss of money or votes or both. I'm frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in 'A,' 'B,' 'C,' and 'D.' Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today: I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of 'conservatism.' "
    - Barry Goldwater
  • freedom2009
    Well, so since you dont believe in god(S) you MUST believe in evolution!
    If you truly believed that, you would want evolution to take place in human life naturaly, there is no morality in evolution. You either survive or you don't. So, since you want the government to take control over your life, you are not practicing true evolution. So, stop using religious morality as an excuse that government should provide healthcare. You cannot have it both ways. Be free or die.
  • slewis11
    We are not in heaven yet. Until doctors, medical equipment and drug companies are willing to give away their products and services for free - the money for healthcare will have to come from somewhere. I am not alone in wondering why nearly half of my paycheck counts for naught at the end of the day. I am constantly disgusted at the lack of money that actually gets appropriated to medical treatment for the poor. We live in a capitalist society in one of the best countries in the world. We need to work with that and better use the resources (and tax dollars) that we have. I will never agree that Socialism (socialized medicine) in this lifetime will work or is even the answer.
  • freedom2009
    It will not, it has never in any other country. Your check is worthless because you pay for social security you will never get (tax) you pay state and federal taxes. (tax) When you take your money and go buy something you pay more taxes. You pay taxes on your bills, you pay taxes on everything but medical care. Wait, if the bill passes; there is a new medical device tax that include new taxes on toothbrushes, tampons, condoms, wheel chairs, breast implants, surgeries, and thats just the start. We are screwed and the sad thing is the poor will suffer the most.
    Irony
  • xtra
    What would Jesus do? What Jesus did..He healed the sick for free.
    Therefore, the perfect health care reform would be to require people who have the gifts and skills to heal people for free. Doctors, nurses, hospitals should work for free.
    Think of it as a 100% tax. As the tax rate for the middle income is rapidly approaching 100% the tax payer will be working for free. What is wrong with that? Eliminate the middlemen; the taxpayer, the insurance companies and the government dole. If the Doctor's refuse to do their moral duty or moonlight for pay, take their licenses or send them to jail for repeated offenses.
    It is the Doctor's, nurse's, hospital's moral and civic duty to donate their money time and services for the general welfare..That is even in the Constitution!
  • stephaniemhazel
    Just a small comment here on this article & it's well-presented premise.

    Ahem . . . based on some fairly extensive research into Mother Teresa's life & Mother's calling to work with the untouchables, etc. during her mission here on earth, I really cannot recall the Indian gov't (or any other gov't for that matter) working up a massive, untenably financed program to make this happen for her. She simply responded to God's call, left Europe & went. Her spiritual battles were enormous and persisted her entire life but she kept on - regardless. She also devoted significant amounts of time each day to prayer in solitude. Heaven only knows the yearnings, pain & peace she found during those times that sustained her in her work. And finally, I want to remind everyone of what one of the lepers she took care of asked her one day as she was changing his bandages. His weak & frail eyes met hers, he looked up at her and said, "This Jesus you always talk about . . . is He like you?". She softly spoke, "no, I simply try to be like Him". Every person is called to meet the needs of those around them - one person, one beating heart, one soul at a time. That's all we've ever been asked to do. The only question is, will we?
  • Almoderate
    Actually, johnbrewer, you're slightly incorrect. Remember that the government tried to free Jesus-- multiple times. It was a mob of angry people (egged on by the pharisees) who demanded he get the death penalty and that a murderer go free instead.

    While many argue that health care is not a government issue and that it should be left up to the people, I have a feeling that the real reason this is argued is because those same people don't want to have anything to do with it AT ALL.

    If you can provide health care, then DO IT. You've had two thousand years to do it on your own, and from where I'm standing, you suck at it. So why not try something different or at least allow something to pick up the slack where the church is leaving it? God is giving us "two rowboats and a helicopter," but we're sitting on the roof and refusing them while the water is rising around us.

    To say that we shouldn't utilize the government's help to do what needs to be done because we're Christians is about as absurd as refusing medical treatment because God will heal you. Don't put God to foolish tests. He gave us tools to use, so use them. There's absolutely no reason why we can't work with and through our government to accomplish the goals Jesus set for us. But too many folks are too focused on not working at all rather than using this golden opportunity to help frame a good solution.
  • freedom2009
    You need to read the Bible. You are sadly wrong.
  • RyanMcAroni
    Stating that someone or something is wrong does absolutely nothing. If you're going to make comments like this please state why they are "wrong".

    So, you think the government didn't try to free Jesus multiple times? You think that mere corporate ceos seeking profit are doing a good job of taking care of the sick and ill? You think our country has been/ is going in the right direction with our health care policies/ health care companies?

    I think Almoderate has made great points in his comment, but then we have to put up with people like you disputing those points with their worthless comments. I know you have an opinion on the issue, but your comment has to have some substance to it for it to mean anything.

    My thoughts on the issue come from the bible:
    James 1:27 "Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world."

    James 2 "My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don't show favoritism. Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in. If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, "Here's a good seat for you," but say to the poor man, "You stand there" or "Sit on the floor by my feet," have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?
    Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him? But you have insulted the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court? Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong?
    If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, "Love your neighbor as yourself," you are doing right. But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. For he who said, "Do not commit adultery," also said, "Do not murder." If you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a lawbreaker.

    Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom, because judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment!
    What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save him? Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to him, "Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed," but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.
    But someone will say, "You have faith; I have deeds."
    Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.
    You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.

    You foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless? Was not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness," and he was called God's friend. You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.

    In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.
  • scoobadoobs
    Jesus is NOT the federal government! Jesus was not even a politician. Why then, do we think, that having a federal mandate is a good idea and one that Jesus would approve of? NO! He is interested in our hearts. He wants us to love our neighbor, care for the elderly ON OUR OWN..NOT the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!
    And for the guy in the article who can't find anything in the Bible that says that Jesus is concerned about our ailments..."Our Father, Who art in Heaven..give us this day, our DAILY BREAD...." . He wants a relationship with us and he wants us to talk to him everyday about our problems. Illness is a BIG problem. He will work in our hearts in His time, NOT ours and certainly not the federal governments!
  • johnbrewer
    Jesus was all about love. Do unto others... But if I remember correctly it was a government that crucified Jesus for his preaching. Government is not the solution... It is the problem!!!! The health care system is broken and needs addressing. The solutions offered by the government will make things worse and not better.
  • government is not the problem without government we have no order give unto ceaser the things that are ceasers, give unto God the things that are Gods.. we have become a country of greed all I hear from those opposed to any change is what will it cost me... prerhaps your soul
  • freedom2009
    Greed, um does that include those who want the government to steal from people who make wealth, make jobs, and pay the tax, then give it to those who do not do anything but cry and wait until someone comes?

    YEP.....you support slavery, taking from people who work and give to those who do nothing. You will alwasy be poor because it is the way you live your live. If you believe in god, or evolution you would want to be free from the men who rule you.
    You will see shortly that thier will be no jobs in this country from his policies.
  • bluesharp
    Last I checked , we ARE the Government....a self-governed people.

    Corporations are amoral by definition and beholden only to profit, CEO yachts & castles and shareholders, whose only concern is profit.

    Ask yourself...Which camp would Jesus choose?
  • freedom2009
    Um so then why do you Like Obama? He and his General Electric pal on his economic advisory panel are fooling you.
    GE owns NBC, MSNBC and many other channels and they condition you into believing what they want you to know. GE is set to make billions off of Cap and Tax, Healthcare Reform, Bailouts and that is just the start. You will get nothing from it but less healthcare, more taxes on you, and misery. You will not even get healthcare to after 3 years from now. You are clueless.
    I would clearly not be in your camp. You can have it; the men you do not know, who own the media you believe, who tell you what is best for you. You will see that the corporations will get richer while the government takes more from you. Its priceless. Obama has raised cig taxes and when the health care bill pass you will be paying taxes on condoms, tampons and toothbrushes just to say a few. Read the healthcare bill. LOL

    SUCKER....
  • johnbrewer
    !
  • johnbrewer
    Government is amoral by definition beholden to special interest groups and not the people as you claim. It was a special interest group (the Pharisees) that strongly encouraged the government (Rome) to crucify Jesus. There are some corrupt corporations, but are you seriously saying that the desire to make an honest profit is immoral? Corporations spend billions every year for various charities. It that also evil? To answer your question, I honestly doubt that Jesus would choose either. I'm not about to put words in the mouth of Jesus. To contend that Jesus would be in favor of a government run healthcare system assumes that you can speak knowing the heart and mind of Jesus. I'm not that arrogant.
  • bluesharp
    "There's a fight in is this country over civilization. Some of us believe in science, analytical thought, personal freedoms, rule of law and a common morality that does not discriminate against those who are outside our group. We don't like violence, even if we believe that war is sometimes necessary. Our opponents who don't believe in these things are basically barbarians.
    They hate science, love fundamentalist religon, disdain the rule of law and see no problem with changing standards of morality for those seen as others - whether it's torturing Muslims or denying marriage to gay couples. They actually like war, and don't like diplomacy. There are a lot of these people."
    -- G Powell
  • johnbrewer
    So anybody that has a difference of opinion to yours is a barbarian, however, you do not discriminate against them? You are attempting to stereotype ideological opponents on a variety of topics into a single sub-respectable class of people. From the left we are bombarded with the phrase "power in diversity". Yet you seem to want to gather all differences of yours into a group that is to be disdained, scorned, and hated. It is easy for someone to reject an intelligent thought if they have pre-conceived notion about its source. That's called discrimination. An intelligent person can listen to an opinion and decide whether to accept or reject based on its own merit and regardless of its source. That is the true power of diversity.
  • hcl777
    Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and to God the things that are God's.
blog comments powered by Disqus

WEEKLY PICKS: do more now

Weekly Tweets

  • Alright we're out of here. Good day Weekly readers. #Katopodis 4 days ago
  • Prosecution objects to the "substantive reasonableness" of Bowdre's sentence for #Katopodis. 4 days ago
  • 3 years supervised release after he gets out. Bowdre's been asked to put #Katopodis in a minimum security prison with credit for time se ... 4 days ago
  • I wonder how much Jefferson county gets monthly in restitution from people who have defrauded the county? #Katopodis 4 days ago
  • Prosecution asks for $166000 in restitution to Jefferson County, Bowdre makes it so. 4 days ago
  • 3 years, 10 months. I think prosecutors were asking for six years. #Katopodis 4 days ago
  • #Katopodis gets 46 months. 4 days ago
  • Bowdre said she found a letter from a fellow inmate to be especially moving. Inmate said #Katopodis is very encouraging of others in jail. 4 days ago
  • Bowdre: #Katopodis is not going to jail for helping others, he's going to jail for helping himself to other people's money. 4 days ago
  • Bowdre about to deliver the sentence, talking about it now. #Katopodis 4 days ago
  • Martin is laying it on #Katopodis. Says JK is probably best educated defendant that's been in this building, he should have known better. 4 days ago
  • We're back. Martin says #Katopodis case is one of the most disgusting he's seen, doesn't have God in his heart, has larceny in his heart. 4 days ago
  • More updates...

War on Dumb

Birmingham 101: What will history say about us?

Birmingham 101: What will history say about us?

‘The city of perpetual promise.’ Does that mean incessant failure? Or rather, that Birmingham never gives up hope?

Upon Further Review

Bama wins, 2010 and amen

Bama wins, 2010 and amen

Part two of the college football season recap.

Column

Ties that bind

Ties that bind

A four-in-hand is worth two in the bush

Film

Wonderland without wonder

Wonderland without wonder

Burton’s film looks but doesn’t feel like “Alice”

Small World Cartoons

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

In lieu of politics, I bring you talking roaches. Cartoonists are primary NPD sufferers.

(Click cartoon [...]

Suburban Legends

The King of Rock: No, Not Elvis

The King of Rock: No, Not Elvis

The world is designed to piss me off