Comments on: Defense rests without Langford testimony http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/10/27/defense-rests-without-langford-testimony/ News, Entertainment & Points of View Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:10:32 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: uberVU - social comments http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/10/27/defense-rests-without-langford-testimony/comment-page-1/#comment-3892 uberVU - social comments Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:02:40 +0000 http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=9794#comment-3892 <strong>Social comments and analytics for this post...</strong> This post was mentioned on Twitter by BhamWeekly: Langford Trial Day 7: Afternoon Recap. For once, Langford's quiet. http://bit.ly/cgAyA... Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by BhamWeekly: Langford Trial Day 7: Afternoon Recap. For once, Langford’s quiet. http://bit.ly/cgAyA…

]]> By: Kathy http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/10/27/defense-rests-without-langford-testimony/comment-page-1/#comment-3890 Kathy Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:11:23 +0000 http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=9794#comment-3890 <i>The defense has insinuated that Danforah ran a scam on Langford, Montgomery investment banker Bill Blount and lobbyist Al LaPierre by double-billing them for Langford’s purchases.</i><br><br>I can't figure out how this helps Langford? Is the jury supposed to feel sorry for the two crooks who may have been overcharged when they paid their bribes? The defense has insinuated that Danforah ran a scam on Langford, Montgomery investment banker Bill Blount and lobbyist Al LaPierre by double-billing them for Langford’s purchases.

I can't figure out how this helps Langford? Is the jury supposed to feel sorry for the two crooks who may have been overcharged when they paid their bribes?

]]>