<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Birmingham might need budget rewrite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/11/03/birmingham-might-need-budget-rewrite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/11/03/birmingham-might-need-budget-rewrite/</link>
	<description>News, Entertainment &#38; Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:54:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Almoderate</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/11/03/birmingham-might-need-budget-rewrite/comment-page-1/#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>Almoderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=9977#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>Kyle...  I have to take the opportunity here to say thank you for covering the budget issues from the beginning.  The Birmingham News might have provided a blurb or two along the way, but your coverage has by far exceeded theirs.  And their editorial piece today that sounded somewhat shocked that there was a budget shortfall just really got under my skin.  I couldn&#039;t understand why anyone would have been shocked.  We&#039;ve known for months, thanks to your excellent work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suppose I&#039;m not the only person in the Birmingham area who feels that the News sold out to people who we can now officially refer to as &quot;crooks&quot; (with an actual jury conviction).  It&#039;s always been good to see that the Weekly still has us covered and never gave into the pressure from Langford and his cronies.  I have a great deal of respect for this publication.  It is precisely what freedom of the press was intended to be for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle&#8230;  I have to take the opportunity here to say thank you for covering the budget issues from the beginning.  The Birmingham News might have provided a blurb or two along the way, but your coverage has by far exceeded theirs.  And their editorial piece today that sounded somewhat shocked that there was a budget shortfall just really got under my skin.  I couldn&#39;t understand why anyone would have been shocked.  We&#39;ve known for months, thanks to your excellent work.</p>
<p>I suppose I&#39;m not the only person in the Birmingham area who feels that the News sold out to people who we can now officially refer to as &#8220;crooks&#8221; (with an actual jury conviction).  It&#39;s always been good to see that the Weekly still has us covered and never gave into the pressure from Langford and his cronies.  I have a great deal of respect for this publication.  It is precisely what freedom of the press was intended to be for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.bhamweekly.com/2009/11/03/birmingham-might-need-budget-rewrite/comment-page-1/#comment-3963</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhamweekly.com/?p=9977#comment-3963</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the Council have the responsibility to demand answers to its questions before passing the budget?  Seems like there&#039;s some serious buck-passing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#39;t the Council have the responsibility to demand answers to its questions before passing the budget?  Seems like there&#39;s some serious buck-passing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>